Dissolved Oxygen Depletion in the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel: Physical and Chemical Processes Conceptual Model

Current location:   Home  >  Physical Processes Model  >  References Cited


Home page About These Models Site map Comment or contribute Biological and ecological effects model main page How to use this model Basic Concepts  Aconyms list (opens in a new window) References cited Download printable text for each species Links to other resources TMDL working group home page Additional information about affected fish species Other conceptual models Physical and chemical processes conceptual model main page




Physical and Chemical Processes References Cited

Get Adobe Reader Many of the resources on this page are in PDF format. PDFs can be viewed and printed using the free Adobe Reader. Click here to download the latest version of Adobe Reader.

American Public Health Association. 1989. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association. (Find in a Library)

American River Watershed Group. 2004. American River water quality monitoring network inventory (WQ inventory); North Fork American River sediment dynamics study proposal. Last revised: January 9, 2004. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 168k)

Beasley, D., W. BJ. Miller, W. BJ. Ritter, M. Robinson, L. Wassenaar, and A. Jassby. 2003. ERP selection panel review of the upstream monitoring and investigations of the San Joaquin River and tributaries related to dissolved oxygen. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 816k)

Boydstun, L. B. 2001. Ocean salmon fishery management. Pages 182–196 in R. L. Brown (ed.), Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. (Fish Bulletin 179 v.2). Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Fish and Game. (Download PDF, 176k)

Brown, D. L., and D. M. Wood. 2002. Measure key connections between the river and floodplain. Report to The Nature Conservancy. Last revised: May 1, 2002. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 1.3MB)

Brown, R. T. 2002. Evaluation of Stockton deep water ship channel. Water quality model simulation of 2001 conditions: loading estimates and model sensitivity. (J&S 01-417). Sacramento, CA. Prepared for San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Technical Advisory Committee, and CALFED Water Quality Program. (Download PDF, 188k)

Brown, R., and S. Renehan. 2002. Technical memo on thermal stratification in the DWSC. Last revised: May 30, 2002. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/dwsc/index.htm. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 336k)

California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. 1999. Central Valley RWQCB Regional toxic hot spot clean up plan for dissolved oxygen - 1999 (Toxic hot spot clean up plan for D.O. - 1999 - condensed from original publication). Available at: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 64k)

California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. 2004. Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the control program for factors contributing to the dissolved oxygen impairment in the Stockton deep water ship channel. Draft-final Staff Report . Last revised: December 13, 2004. Available: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/programs/tmdl/sjr_do/. Accessed: April 21, 2005. (Download PDF, 6.9MB)

Chapra, S. 1997. Surface Water-Quality Modeling. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Cited in: Jassby, A. D. 2005. Phytoplankton regulation in a eutrophic tidal river (San Joaquin River, California). San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Vol. 3, Issue 1 (March 2005), Article 3. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol3/iss1/art3

Chen, C. W., and W. Tsai. 2002. Improvements and calibrations of lower San Joaquin River DO model. Revised March 2002. San Ramon, CA. Prepared for CALFED 2000 Grant, Sacramento CA. (Download PDF, 900k)

Chen, C., and W. Tsai. 2003. Impact of low flow on DO in January-February of 2003. Presentation. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 24k)

Dubrovsky, N. M., C. R. Kratzer, L. R. Brown, J. M. Gronberg, and K. R. Burow. 1998. Water quality in the San Joaquin–Tulare basins, California, 1992-95. (U. S. Geological Survey Circular 1159.) Washington, DC: U. S. Geological Survey. (Download PDF, 3.4MB)

El Dorado County, Environmental Management Department. 2004. A guide for the private well owner. El Dorado, CA: El Dorado County. (Download PDF, 3.2MB)

Fleenor, G. 2004. Hydrodynamic and oxygen modeling of the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel (ERP ERP–02D 02D–P51 P51). Presentation. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 292k)

Foe, C., M. Gowdy, and M. McCarthy. 2002. Draft strawman allocation of responsibility report. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 912k)

Garello, M. 2004. APPENDIX A: San Joaquin River dissolved oxygen aeration project - draft engineering feasibility study (demonstration aeration project). HDR Engineering, Inc. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 3.3MB)

Golet, G. H., D. L. Brown, E. E. Crone, G. R. Geupel, S. E. Greco, K. D. Holl, D. E. Jukkola, et al. 2001. Using science to evaluate restoration efforts and ecosystem health on the Sacramento River Project, California. Pages in P. M. Faber (ed.) Pp. 368–385 in P. M. Faber (ed.) 2003, California Riparian Systems: Processes and Floodplain Management, Ecology, and Restoration. 2001 Riparian Habitat and Floodplains Conference Proceedings, Riparian Habitat Joint Venture. Sacramento: CA: The Wildlife Society. (Download PDF, 472k)

Gowdy, M., and L. Grober. 2004. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Control program for factors contributing to the dissolved oxygen impairment in the Stockton deep water ship channel. Presentation at the April 23, 2004 Board Workshop. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 76k)

Gowdy, M. and L. Grober. 2005. Amendments to the water quality control plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River basins for the control program for factors contributing to the dissolved oxygen impairment in the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel. Final staff report. Rancho Cordova, CA. Prepared for the California Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. (Download PDF, 1.6MB)

Grant, J. A., W. Bentley, C. Pickel, and J. Groh-Lowrimore. 2003. BIOS approach tested for controlling walnut pests in San Joaquin Valley. California Agriculture 57(3):86–92. (Download PDF, 172k)

Gronberg, J. A. M., N. M. Dubrovsky, C. R. Kratzer, J. L. Domagalski, L. R. Brown, and K. R. Burow. 1998. Environmental setting of the San Joaquin–Tulare basins, California. (Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4205.) Sacramento, CA: U. S. Geological Survey. (Download PDF, 4.3MB)

Hayes, S. P., and J. S. Lee. 1998. Fall dissolved oxygen conditions in the Stockton ship channel for 1997. IEP Newsletter 11(3):21–23. (Download PDF, 392k)

Hayes, S. P., and J. S. Lee. 1999. 1998 Fall dissolved oxygen conditions in the Stockton Ship Channel. IEP Newsletter 12(2):5–7. (Download PDF, 180k)

Hayes, S. P., and J. S. Lee. 2000a. A comparison of fall Stockton Ship Channel dissolved oxygen levels in years with low, moderate, and high inflows. IEP Newsletter 13(1):51–56. (Download PDF, 336k)

Hayes, S. P., and J. S. Lee. 2000b. Dissolved oxygen levels in the Stockton ship channel. IEP Newsletter 13(1):10–11. (Download PDF, 20k)

HDR Engineering, Inc. 2000. Field reports on water quality testing around McCloud Lake "Piggyback Testing" for TMDL. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 212k)

Herren, J. R., and S. S. Kawasaki. 2001. Inventory of water diversions in four geographic areas in California’s central valley. Pages 343-355 in R. L. Brown (ed.), Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. (Fish Bulletin 179 v.2). Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Fish and Game. (Download PDF, 384k)

Hildebrand, A. 2004. Letter to Regional Board from South Delta Water Agency on DO TMDL and Basin Plan Amendment. April 21, 2004. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 60k)

Horne, A. J., and C. R. Goldman. 1994. Limnology. 2nd Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc. (Find in a Library)

Hunt, L. 2002. San Joaquin River dissolved oxygen TMDL studies; peer review summary final. Last revised: July 1, 2002. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2001_studies/reports/index.htm. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 604k)

Hutton, P. H. 2001. Upstream water quality model. Quarterly programmatic report. Last revised: December 31, 2001. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2001_studies/reports/index.htm. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 116k)

Hutton, P. H. 2002. Initial final report for 2001 studies, CALFED SJR DO TMDL Directed Action Project. Development of upstream water quality model. Last revised: February 2002. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2001_studies/reports/pre_9_30/upstream.htm. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 160k)

Jacobs, K. C. 2001. IEP data management, quarterly programmatic report. September 30, 2001. Last revised: October 11, 2001. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2001_studies/reports/index.htm. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 68k)

Jones & Stokes. 2000. San Joaquin River dissolved oxygen total maximum daily load. Submission of Stockton Regional Water Control Facility data collected Fall of 1999. Last revised: January 10, 2000. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2000_studies/index.html. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 252k)

Jones & Stokes. 2001a. City of Stockton year 2000 field sampling program. Data summary report. Last revised: March 23, 2001. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/ technical/2000_studies/reports/. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 944k)

Jones & Stokes. 2001b. Tidal dilution of the Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility Discharge into the San Joaquin River. (J&S 99-044). Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the City of Stockton Department of Municipal Utilities, Stockton, CA. (Download PDF, 1.9MB)

Jones & Stokes. 2002a. City of Stockton year 2001 field sampling program. Data summary report. Last revised: March 20, 2002. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2001_studies/reports/. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 3.8MB)

Jones & Stokes. 2002b. Evaluation of Stockton deep water ship channel Water Quality Model Simulation of 2001 Conditions: loading estimates and model sensitivity. (J&S 01-417). Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Technical Advisory Committee and CALFED Water Quality Program, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 892k)

Jones & Stokes. 2002c. Stockton deep water ship channel tidal hydraulics and downstream tidal exchange. (J&S 01-417). Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 2.6MB)

Jones & Stokes. 2003. Evaluation of aeration technology for the Stockton deep water channel. Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 1.7MB)

Jones & Stokes. 2004a. Aeration research and implementation analysis study for the Stockton deep water ship channel. (J&S 03-189). Irvine, CA. Prepared for the California Bay-Delta Authority, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 244k)

Jones & Stokes. 2004b. Aeration technology feasibility report for the San Joaquin River deep water ship channel. Draft. (J&S 03-405). Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the California Bay-Delta Authority, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 7.7MB)

Jones & Stokes. 2004c. Monitoring plan for the Stockton deep water ship channel aeration project. (J&S 03-405). Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the California Bay-Delta Authority, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 2.3MB)

Jones & Stokes. 2004d. San Joaquin River dissolved oxygen TMDL; screening criteria for non-aeration feasibility studies. (J&S 03-405). Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 148k)

Kratzer, C. 2004. Nitrate inputs from groundwater. Last revised: July 26, 2004. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 440k)

Kratzer, C. R. 1994. An assessment of the increasing nitrate trend in the Lower San Joaquin River, California. Page 5 in S. K. Sorenson (ed.), Proceedings abstracts of the American Water Resources Association’s Symposium on the National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program, November 7-9, 1994. (U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-397). U. S. Geological Survey. Chicago, IL. (Download PDF, 20k)

Kratzer, C. R., and J. L. Shelton. 1998. Water quality assessments of the San Joaquin--Tulare basins, California: analysis of available data on nutrients and suspended sediment in surface water, 1972-1990. (U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1587.) National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Denver, CO. (Download PDF, 4.1MB)

Kratzer, C. R., and R. N. Biagtan. 1997. Determination of traveltimes in the lower San Joaquin River basin, California, from dye-tracer studies during 1994-1995. Sacramento, CA. U. S. Geological Survey. (Download PDF, 308k)

Kratzer, C. R., P. D. Dileanis, C. Zamora, S. R. Silva, C. Kendall, B.A. Bergamaschi, and R. A. Dahlgren. 2004. Sources and transport of nutrients, organic carbon, and chlorophyll-a in the San Joaquin River upstream of Vernalis, California, during Summer and Fall, 2000 and 2001. (Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4127.) U. S. Geological Survey. Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 5.7MB)

Lee, G. F. 2001. Developing appropriate stormwater runoff water-quality management programs. Stormwater 2(4):Guest Editorial. Available at: http://www.forester.net/sw_0106_guest_editorial.html.

Lee, G. F. 2004. Comments on scoping meeting and public workshop on the development of a basin plan amendment to establish a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for low dissolved oxygen in the San Joaquin River deep water ship channel. Last revised: January 6, 2004. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 120k)

Lee, G. F., and A. Jones-Lee. 2000. Issues in developing the San Joaquin River Deep Water Ship Channel DO TMDL. El Macero, CA. Prepared for the San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load Steering Committee and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 4.9MB)

Lee, G. F., and A. Jones-Lee. 2001. Issues in developing the San Joaquin River, CA DO TMDL. Presentation at the WEF TMDL Science Conference, St. Louis MO. Last revised: March 2001. Available: http://www.gfredlee.com. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 1.9MB)

Lee, G. F., and A. Jones-Lee. 2002. Review of management practices for controlling the water quality impacts of potential pollutants in irrigated agriculture stormwater runoff and tailwater discharges. (California Water Institute Report TP 02-05.) El Macero, CA. Prepared for the State Water Resources Control Board and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 2.8MB)

Lee, G. F., and A. Jones-Lee. 2003. Synthesis and discussion of findings on the causes and factors influencing low DO in the San Joaquin River deep water channel near Stockton, CA: including 2002 data. El Macero, CA. Prepared for SJR DO TMDL Steering Committee and Technical Advisory Committee, CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento CA. (Download PDF, 7.9MB)

Lee, G. F., and A. Jones-Lee. 2004. Recommended approach for controlling the low-DO problem in the SJR DWSC. Draft. El Macero, CA. (Download PDF, 28k)

Lehman, P. W. 2003. Sources of oxygen demand in the San Joaquin River Deep Water Channel. Final. Department of Water Resources. Sacramento, CA. Prepared for CALFED Bay-Delta Program. (Download PDF, 2.8MB)

Lehman, P. W., and C. Ralston. 2001. The contribution of algal biomass to oxygen depletion in the San Joaquin River, 1999. Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/1999/lehman/index.html. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 472k)

Lehman, P. W., J. Giulianotti, and J. Sevier. 2001. The contribution of algal biomass to oxygen demand in the San Joaquin River deep water channel, Fall 2000. Draft. Sacramento, CA. Prepared by Department of Water Resources, Environmental Services Offices, Sacramento CA. (Download PDF, 1.2MB)

Lehman, P. W., J. Sevier, J. Giulianotti, and M. Johnson. 2004. Sources of oxygen demand in the lower San Joaquin River, California. Estuaries 27(3):405–418. (Find in a Library)

Leland, H. V., L. R. Brown, and D. K. Mueller. 2001. Distribution of algae in the San Joaquin River, California, in relation to nutrient supply, salinity and other environmental factors. Freshwater Biology 46:1139–1167. (View Abstract)

Litton, G. M. 2001a. Sediment oxygen demand, sediment deposition rates and biochemical oxygen demand kinetics in the San Joaquin River near Stockton, California. Fall, 1999. Final. Stockton, CA. Prepared for City of Stockton and San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Technical Committee. (Download PDF, 324k)

Litton, G. M. 2001b. Stockton Channel water quality improvements, nutrient data and discussion. El Macero, CA. Prepared for the San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load Steering Committee and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 1.8MB)

Litton, G. M. 2003. Deposition rates and oxygen demands in the Stockton deep water channel of the San Joaquin River. June – November 2001. Stockton, CA. Prepared for San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Steering Committee and CALFED. (Download PDF, 896k)

Litton, G. M., and J. Nakaido. 2001. Sediment deposition rates and associated oxygen demands in the deep water ship channel of the San Joaquin River. Stockton, California July-November, 2000 (draft). Available: http://www.sjrtmdl.org/technical/2000_studies. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 1.1MB)

Lowney, C. L., E. S. Andrews, C. B. Bowles, J. A. Haas, and S. Blake. 2004. Evaluation of a non-structural flood management and habitat enhancement alternative at the San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge. Last revised: May 26, 2004. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 244k)

Marcotte, K. 2004. CBDA Ecosystem Restoration Program role in D.O. problem in San Joaquin River. CALFED. Presentation at the April 23, 2004 Board Workshop. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 100k)

Marcotte, K. 2005. Directions to reviewers for screening criteria of non-aeration linkages to D.O. conditions; Phase I. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin /listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 28k)

McCarty, P.L. 1969. An Evaluation of Algal Decomposition in the San Joaquin Estuary. Report to the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Research Grant DI-I6010 DJL, Civil Engineering Department, Stanford Univerity. Cited by: Foe, C., M. Gowdy, and M. McCarthy. 2002. Draft strawman allocation of responsibility report. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/ san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html? Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005.

McEwan, D. R. 2001. Central valley steelhead. Pages 1-44 in R. L. Brown (ed.), Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. (Fish Bulletin 179 v.1). Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Fish and Game. (Download PDF, 556k)

Mesick, C. 2001. The effects of San Joaquin River flows and Delta export rates during October on the number of adult San Joaquin Chinook salmon that stray. Pages 139-162 in R. L. Brown (ed.), Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. (Fish Bulletin 179 v.2). Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Fish and Game. (Download PDF, 456k)

Mount, J. F., J. L. Florsheim, and W. B. Townbridge. 2003. Restoration of dynamic flood plain topography and riparian vegetation establishment through engineered levee breaching. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 288k)

Quinn, N. W. T., and A. Tulloch. 2002. San Joaquin River diversion data assimilation, drainage estimation and installation of diversion monitoring stations. Mariposa, CA. Prepared for CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 8.8MB)

Rajbhandari, H., P. Nader, and P. Hutton. 2002. DSM2 studies to investigate the use of auxiliary flow pumps across South Delta flow structures. Dept. of Water Resources, Bay-Delta Office. Sacramento, CA. Prepared for CALFED Bay-Delta Program. (Download PDF, 1.2MB)

Ralston, C., and S. P. Hayes. 2002. Fall dissolved oxygen conditions in the Stockton Ship Channel for 2000. IEP Newsletter 15(1):26–31. (Download PDF, 320k)

Rasmussen, D., and K. Jacobs. 2004. California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program – “SWAMP” update. Last revised: 2004. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 28k)

River Partners. 2004. Project summary – Llano Seco riparian sanctuary planning project. Available: http://www.riverpartners.org/riparian/riparian_documents.html. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 364k)

Roberson, M., and K. Wolf. 2004. Non-aeration feasibility studies criteria evaluation for the San Joaquin River dissolved oxygen TMDL (non-aeration studies criteria) . Last revised. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 24k)

Schneider, K. S., G. M. Kondolf, and A. Falzone. 2003. Channel-floodplain disconnection on the Stanislaus River: a hydrologic and geomorphic perspective. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF)

Shilling, F., S. Sommarstrom, R. Kattelmann, B. Washburn, J. Florsheim, and R. Henly. 2004. California watershed assessment manual. Prepared for the California Resources Agency. Available: http://cwam.ucdavis.edu. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 5.0MB)

Silva, S., and C. Kendall. n.d. Overview of how we will be tracing sources/sinks of organic matter and nitrate using isotropic techniques in several new DO-related projects. Presentation. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 8, 2005. (Download PDF, 336k)

Smith, P., and B. Fleenor. 2004. 3 dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of the Stockton DWSC. Presentation. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 5.3MB)

Stringfellow, W. T., and N. W. T. Quinn. 2002. Discriminating between west-side sources of nutrients and organic carbon contributing to algal growth and oxygen demand in the San Joaquin River. Final. Berkeley, CA. Prepared for San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Technical Advisory Committee and CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA. (Download PDF, 868k)

Stringfellow, W., and J. McGahan. 2003. CALFED directed action proposal for monitoring and investigations of the San Joaquin River and tributaries related to dissolved oxygen. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Authority. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 4.8MB)

Swenson, R. O., K. Whitener, and M. Eaton. 2003. Restoring floods to floodplains: riparian and floodplain restoration at the Cosumnes River Preserve. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 612k)

Swiecki, T. J., and E. A. Bernhardt. 2003. Effects of stand thinning on water relations, growth, and condition of three tree species in a riparian restoration planting. Pp. 280–289 in P. M. Faber (ed.) 2003, California Riparian Systems: Processes and Floodplain Management, Ecology, and Restoration. 2001 Riparian Habitat and Floodplains Conference Proceedings, Riparian Habitat Joint Venture. Sacramento: CA: The Wildlife Society. (Download PDF, 264k)

Tchobanoglous, G., and E. D. Schroeder. 1985. Water quality: characteristics, modeling, modification. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Find in a Library)

The Nature Conservancy. Sacramento River Project. 2003. Methods for evaluating ecosystem integrity and monitoring ecosystem response. Available: http://www.sacramentoriverportal.org/eco_indicators/ecosys_response_eval.htm. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 460K)

Thuman, A., L. De Rosa, and R. Brown. 2004. SJR DO depletion modeling progress update. Hydroqual DWSC model, presentation. Available: http://www.watershedportals.org/san_joaquin/listDocOfType_html?Type=24. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999a. Protocol for developing nutrient TMDLs. First Edition. EPA 841-B-99-007. Office of Water. Washington, DC. (Download PDF, 2.5MB)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999b. Protocol for developing sediment TMDLs. First Edition. EPA 841-B-99-004. Office of Water. Washington, DC. (Download PDF, 1.7MB)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Stressor identification guidance document. EPA 822-B-00-025. Office of Water. Washington, DC. (Download PDF, 1.9MB)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Protocol for developing pathogen TMDLs. First Edition. EPA 841-R-00-002. Office of Water. Washington, DC. (Download PDF, 2MB)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. The twenty needs report: how research can improve the TMDL Program. EPA 841-B-02-002. Office of Water. Washington, DC. (Download PDF, 1MB)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Water quality trading assessment handbook; can water quality trading advance your watershed’s goals? EPA 841-B-04-001. Office of Water. Washington, DC. (Download PDF, 1.5MB)

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. [n.d.]. Anadromous Fish Restoration Program: AFRP overview. Available: http://www.delta.dfg.ca.gov/afrp/overview.asp. Accessed: April 11, 2005. (Download PDF, 504k)

Van Nieuwenhuyse, E. E. 2002. Statistical model of dissolved oxygen concentration in the San Joaquin River Stockton deepwater channel at Rough and Ready Island, 1983-2001. Revised April 18, 2002. U. S. Bureau of Reclamation. Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the San Joaquin Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Technical Advisory Committee. (Download PDF, 1.3MB)

Williams, J. G. 2001. Chinook salmon in the lower American River, California’s largest urban stream. Pages 1-38 in R. L. Brown (ed.), Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. (Fish Bulletin 179 v.2). Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Fish and Game. (Download PDF, 656k)

Yang, C. T., F. J. M. Simoes. 1998. Simulation and prediction of river morphologic changes using GSTARS 2.0. Presented at: 3rd International Conference on Hydro-Science and Engineering. Cottbus/Berlin, Germany, August 31-September 3, 1998. Available: http://kfki.baw.de/conferences/ICHE/1998-Cottbus/authors1998.htm. Accessed: April 12, 2005. (Download PDF, 480k)

Yoshiyama, R. M., E. R. Gerstung, F. W. Fisher, and P. B. Moyle. 2001. Historical and present distribution of Chinook salmon in the Central Valley drainage of California. Pages 71-176 in Brown, R.L. (ed.), Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. (Fish Bulletin 179 v.1). Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Fish and Game. (Download PDF, 596k)